Soil Permittivity under Antennas
There is a lot of speculation about the electrical properties, at RF frequencies, of the soil under antennas. Thankfully, there's an interesting data set where some probes were buried near one of the antennas at the Owens Valley Radio Observatory Long Wavelength Array (OVRO-LWA). OVRO-LWA is an array of hundreds of dual polarization fan dipoles that is used as a radio telescope over the 27-85 MHz frequency range.
The probes measure the properties at 50 MHz, and produce data both in terms of the complex permittivity and in the more familiar relative permittivity (Epsilon) and conductivity (sigma, in Siemen/meters). The data were taken over about a 6 month time span including the wet and dry seasons.
As described in the data page, the sensors were buried 4", 14" and 21" deep next to one of the antenna stands. From the page:
"The test pit was dug down to hardpan, which in this location is 22" below ground level. The strata is clean sand down to ~18". From there, the fraction of a green clay-like material increases with depth, reach hardpan as noted above.
The anticipated depth of the hardpan, based on Andres Rizo's experience at site was 10-20'. The actual depth at any given location will depend on river course wander over millenia and the presence of standing surface water."
Data from https://github.com/ovro-lwa/leda_docs/wiki/Soil-Permittivity-Sensors
The actual sensors https://stevenswater.com/resources/datasheets/HydraProbe%202020_draft3.pdf
All of the data Plotted as real vs imaginary epsilon |
21" deep probe
4" deep probe
Take home
If you're modeling your antenna using a tool like NEC, you should model with several combinations of epsilon and sigma, and make sure you understand the performance differences. Using the 13/.008 "good soil" may not be very representative of YOUR location. And particularly for verticals, the soil properties in the far field makes a big difference.